build(vivado): rewrite create_project.tcl for current KeyGen flow

The old script referenced 5 non-existent files (keccak_arbiter,
sha3_chain_top_shared, tb_mlkem_top_xsim, tb_kg/en/de) and stale
vectors, so read_verilog/elaborate failed outright.

Rewrite to mirror the verified XSIM flow (sync_rtl/top/TB/xsim_run.tcl):
  - load exactly the 14 sources mlkem_top depends on
  - sim top = tb_mlkem_kg_katK_xsim, runtime K via generic KP, case via
    -testplusarg CASE
  - copy KAT vectors into the xsim working dir via xsim.compile.tcl.pre
    (the only hook in 2019.2 that runs before $readmemh; an appended
    -tclbatch runs after Vivado's own 'run all', too late)
  - drop duplicate --relax (XSim adds it; passing again is an error)

Verified through the actual Vivado batch project flow:
  K=2 CASE 0 -> PASS (21403 cyc), K=4 CASE 2 -> PASS (54059 cyc),
  0 file-not-found warnings. gitignore the generated vivado_prj/.

Also rewrite README.md in Chinese documenting the mlkem_top workflow
and test flow.
This commit is contained in:
2026-06-28 03:43:56 +08:00
parent 3a53993754
commit 8774e03a0e
3 changed files with 278 additions and 311 deletions

3
.gitignore vendored
View File

@@ -33,3 +33,6 @@ Thumbs.db
# Session runtime continuation cache
.omo/
# Generated Vivado project (create_project.tcl)
vivado_prj/

462
README.md
View File

@@ -1,295 +1,245 @@
# ML-KEM Hardware Implementation (FIPS 203)
# ML-KEM 硬件实现(FIPS 203
A synchronous, pipelined hardware implementation of **ML-KEM** (Module-Lattice-based Key Encapsulation Mechanism), the NIST PQC standard based on Kyber. Written in SystemVerilog, targeting FPGA simulation with Vivado XSIM and verified with Verilator.
基于 SystemVerilog 的 **ML-KEM**Module-Lattice-based Key Encapsulation MechanismNIST 后量子密码标准,源自 Kyber同步流水线硬件实现。面向 FPGA使用 Vivado XSIM 与 Verilator 进行仿真验证。
## Overview
本文档重点介绍顶层密钥生成模块 **`mlkem_top`** 的工作流程及其测试流程。各底层算子SHA-3、NTT、CBD 采样等)已独立验证,本文不再展开。
ML-KEM is a post-quantum key encapsulation mechanism (KEM) standardized by NIST in FIPS 203. It provides IND-CCA2 security based on the hardness of the Module Learning With Errors (MLWE) problem over the polynomial ring Z_q[x]/(x^256 + 1).
## 概述
This implementation decomposes ML-KEM's core operations into independent, synchronous hardware modules with standardized valid/ready streaming interfaces. All modules operate at **100 MHz** (10ns period) and use active-low reset.
ML-KEM 是 NIST 在 FIPS 203 中标准化的后量子密钥封装机制,其安全性基于多项式环 Z_q[x]/(x²⁵⁶+1) 上的 Module-LWE 难题。
### Parameters
`mlkem_top` 实现 **FIPS 203 算法 16KeyGen_internal** 的完整密钥生成数据通路:给定种子 `d``z`,输出封装密钥 `ek`(公钥)和解封装密钥 `dk`(私钥)。模块运行于 **100 MHz**10 ns 周期),低电平复位。
| Parameter | Value | Description |
|-----------|-------|-------------|
| **q** | 3329 | Prime modulus |
| **n** | 256 | Polynomial degree |
| **k** | 2 | Module rank (ML-KEM-512) |
| η₁ | 3 | CBD parameter (secret key) |
| η₂ | 2 | CBD parameter (ciphertext) |
| d_u | 10 | Compress bits |
| d_v | 4 | Compress bits |
### 运行时参数选择
## Repository Structure
**ML-KEM 的安全等级 K 在运行时通过输入端口 `k_i` 选择**而非编译期参数。存储按最坏情况ML-KEM-1024KMAX=4静态分配`k_i``start_i` 时被采样到内部寄存器 `k_r`,据此选取激活的子区间。
| k_i | 方案 | 模块秩 K | η₁ | ek 字节数 | dk 字节数 | KeyGen 周期数 |
|:---:|:---|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| 2 | ML-KEM-512 | 2 | 3 | 800 | 1632 | 21 403 |
| 3 | ML-KEM-768 | 3 | 2 | 1184 | 2400 | 36 207 |
| 4 | ML-KEM-1024 | 4 | 2 | 1568 | 3168 | 54 005 |
> 注:`k_i` 仅在 `start_i` 时采样,且假定取值 ∈ {2,3,4}越界值0/1/57当前不做保护会产生错误的尺寸计算。
固定参数:**q = 3329**(素数模)、**n = 256**多项式次数。du/dv 仅用于封装/解封装KeyGen 不涉及。
## `mlkem_top` 接口
```
mlkem/
├── sync_rtl/ # RTL source (SystemVerilog)
├── common/ # Shared infrastructure
│ ├── pipeline_reg.v # Single-stage valid/ready pipeline register
│ ├── skid_buffer.v # 2-entry skid buffer for backpressure
│ └── defines.vh # Global parameters (Q, N, CLK_PERIOD)
├── sha3/ # Keccak-f[1600] and SHA-3/SHAKE modes
├── keccak_round.v # Single Keccak-f round (θ,ρ,π,χ,ι)
│ ├── keccak_core.v # 24-round sequential Keccak-f[1600] core
│ └── sha3_top.v # SHA3-512(G)/SHA3-256(H)/SHAKE-256(J) wrapper
├── rng/ # Pseudorandom number generator
│ └── rng_sync.v # 256-bit Galois LFSR (taps: 255,253,252,247,0)
├── ntt/ # Number Theoretic Transform
│ │ ├── zeta_rom.v # Twiddle factor ROM (128 × 12-bit, ζ^br(i))
│ │ ├── barrett_mul.v # Barrett modular multiplier (a·b mod q)
│ │ ├── butterfly_unit.v # CT/GS butterfly (NTT/INTT)
│ │ └── ntt_core.v # NTT core: LOAD→COMPUTE→OUTPUT FSM
│ ├── poly_arith/ # Polynomial arithmetic
│ │ └── poly_arith_sync.v # Element-wise poly add/sub (PolyAdd/PolySub)
│ ├── poly_mul/ # Polynomial multiplication
│ │ ├── poly_mul_zeta_rom.v # Zeta ROM for degree-1 basecase multiply
│ │ ├── basecase_mul.v # Degree-1 Karatsuba basecase multiplier
│ │ └── poly_mul_sync.v # Full NTT-domain polynomial multiplier
│ ├── sample_cbd/ # Centered Binomial Distribution sampling
│ │ └── sample_cbd_sync.v # CBDη via SHAKE-256 PRF(seed, nonce)
│ ├── sample_ntt/ # NTT-domain sampling (A matrix)
│ │ └── sample_ntt_sync.v # SampleNTT via SHAKE-128 rejection sampling
│ ├── comp_decomp/ # Coefficient compression
│ │ └── comp_decomp_sync.v # Compress_q / Decompress_q
│ ├── mod_add/ # Modular arithmetic
│ │ └── mod_add_sync.v # (a + b) mod q, streaming
│ └── storage/ # On-chip storage
│ ├── s_bram.v # Single-port behavioral BRAM
│ └── sd_bram.v # Simple dual-port behavioral BRAM
├── test_framework/ # Verilator C++ test framework
│ ├── run_all.py # CLI entry point
│ ├── config.json # Verilator path, clock period, timeouts
│ ├── lib/ # Core framework libraries
│ │ ├── test_runner.py # Discovery, compile, run, compare pipeline
│ │ ├── sim_controller.py # Verilator compile/run wrapper
│ │ ├── vector_gen.py # Base class for vector generators
│ │ ├── result_checker.py # Hex-file comparison
│ │ └── reporter.py # Terminal + HTML output
│ └── modules/ # Per-module test definitions
│ ├── <module>/test_plan.json # Test configuration
│ └── <module>/gen_vectors.py # Python reference + vector generator
├── run_tb.sh # Vivado XSIM testbench runner
├── .trellis/ # Trellis workflow system
│ ├── workflow.md # Development phases
│ ├── spec/ # Coding specs (RTL, testbench conventions)
│ └── tasks/ # Active and archived tasks
└── .opencode/ # OpenCode agent configuration
module mlkem_top #(parameter KMAX = 4) (
input clk, rst_n,
input [2:0] k_i, // 运行时方案选择2/3/4
input [255:0] d_i, // KeyGen 种子 dbyte0 在 d_i[7:0]
input [255:0] z_i, // 隐式拒绝种子 z
input start_i, // 启动脉冲
output busy_o, // 运行中拉高
output done_o, // ek/dk 就绪时拉高
// 调试回读端口(供 TB 逐字节核对,无需宽总线)
input [3:0] dbg_slot_i, input [7:0] dbg_idx_i, output [11:0] dbg_coeff_o,
input dbg_byte_sel_i, input [10:0] dbg_byte_idx_i, output [7:0] dbg_byte_o,
input [11:0] dbg_dk_idx_i, output [7:0] dbg_dk_o,
output [255:0] dbg_rho_o, dbg_sigma_o
);
```
## Module Architecture
`busy_o`/`done_o` 提供握手;`dbg_*` 端口为只读调试抽头,让 TB 可以逐系数 / 逐字节读出中间结果与最终的 ek/dk而无需引出整条数据总线。
### Core Operations
## 工作流程
`mlkem_top` 复用了已独立验证的叶子模块(每个模块自带 keccak_core无共享仲裁器`sha3_top``sample_ntt_sync``sample_cbd_sync``ntt_core``poly_mul_sync`。顶层是一个 8 状态 FSM串行驱动这些算子并把所有中间多项式存放在统一的系数寄存器阵列 `polymem` 中。
### KeyGen 算法FIPS 203 算法 16
```
┌──────────┐
seed │ sample_ │ coeffs (256 × 12-bit)
nonce ─┤ cbd_sync ├─────────────────────┐
└──────────┘
┌──────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
rho │ sample_ │ coeffs │ poly_arith │
k,i,j─┤ ntt_sync ├─────────────┤ poly_mul │──► result
└──────────┘ │ comp_decomp │
└─────────────┘
┌──────────┐ ▲
d_in │ sha3_ │ rho, sigma │
│ chain_top├────────────────────┘
└──────────┘
(ρ, σ) = G(d ‖ K) // SHA3-512
Â[i][j] = SampleNTT(ρ ‖ j ‖ i) i,j ∈ 0..K-1 // SHAKE-128 拒绝采样
s[i] = CBD_η1(PRF(σ, i)) i ∈ 0..K-1 // SHAKE-256
e[i] = CBD_η1(PRF(σ, K+i)) i ∈ 0..K-1
ŝ[i] = NTT(s[i]), ê[i] = NTT(e[i])
t̂[i] = ê[i] + Σⱼ Â[i][j] ∘ ŝ[j] // NTT 域逐点乘 + 累加
ek = byteEncode₁₂(t̂[0..K-1]) ‖ ρ
dk = byteEncode₁₂(ŝ[0..K-1]) ‖ ek ‖ H(ek) ‖ z
```
### Interface Protocol
All modules use a uniform **valid/ready** streaming interface:
### FSM 状态机
```
clk ──╮ ╰──╮ ╰──╮ ╰──╮ ╰──
valid_i ──╯ ╰─────╯ ╰─────
ready_o ──────╮ ╰─────────
data_i ──[A]─────[B]─────────[C]──
valid_o ─────────╮ ╰───────
ready_i ─────────────╮ ╰─────────
data_o ─────────[A']───────[B']──
start_i
ST_IDLE ─────────────────► ST_G
│ G(d‖K),捕获 ρ/σ
│ ▼
ST_A 生成 Â[i][j]K² 个多项式SampleNTT
│ │
│ ▼
│ ST_C 采样 s[i], e[i]2K 个多项式CBD
│ │
│ ▼
│ ST_N 原地前向 NTTŝ[i], ê[i]2K 次)
│ │
│ ▼
│ ST_M t̂[i] = ê[i] + Σⱼ Â[i][j]∘ŝ[j]
│ │
│ ▼
│ ST_E byteEncode₁₂ → ek_mem / dkp_memek 尾接 ρ
│ │
│ ▼
│ ST_H H(ek):多块 SHA3-256
│ done_o │
└────────── ST_DONE ◄───────┘
```
- **Input**: Assert `valid_i` when `ready_o` is high; data transferred on posedge when both are high.
- **Output**: Module asserts `valid_o` when result is ready; downstream asserts `ready_i` to consume.
- **Pipeline**: Modules use `pipeline_reg` internally for 1-cycle latency.
| 状态 | 名称 | 动作 | 使用的算子 |
|:---:|:---|:---|:---|
| ST_G | 哈希 G | `(ρ,σ)=G(d‖K)``data_i={K_byte, d}` | `sha3_top`SHA3-512 |
| ST_A | 矩阵采样 | 逐个生成 Â[i][j],行主序写入 slot `i*K+j`,每个 256 系数 | `sample_ntt_sync` |
| ST_C | CBD 采样 | s[0..K-1]nonce 0..K-1、e[0..K-1]nonce K..2K-1有符号→模 q | `sample_cbd_sync` |
| ST_N | 前向 NTT | 对 ŝ、ê 共 2K 个多项式逐个原地变换 | `ntt_core`mode=0 |
| ST_M | 矩阵乘累加 | 对每个 (i,j):流入 256 对 (Â,ŝ) 做逐点乘,累加进 t̂[i]j=0 时以 ê[i] 初始化) | `poly_mul_sync` |
| ST_E | 字节编码 | byteEncode₁₂t̂→ek_memŝ→dkp_mem末尾拷入 ρ 的 32 字节 | — |
| ST_H | 哈希 H | 对 ek 做多块 SHA3-256得到 H(ek)调用方预填充末块0x06…0x80 | `sha3_top`(多块模式) |
Modules with multi-cycle operations (NTT, sampling) additionally use a `done_o` signal or `last_o` flag.
各状态之间以 valid/ready 握手串接FSM 拉高对应算子的 `valid_i`,在 `ready_o` 时认为请求被接收,再逐拍收集 `valid_o` 输出,直到 `last_o`/`done_o`
## Getting Started
### 存储布局
### Prerequisites
所有多项式存于 `polymem``NUM_SLOTS×256` 个 12-bit 系数,`NUM_SLOTS = KMAX²+3·KMAX = 28`)。每个 slot 256 系数,槽基址在运行时由 `k_r` 推导:
- **Vivado 2019.2+** (for XSIM simulation): `/opt/Xilinx/Vivado/2019.2/`
- **Verilator 5.046** (for C++ testbench): available via `dnf` on Fedora
- **Python 3.10+** (for vector generation): stdlib only
```
slot 0 .. K²-1 : Â[i][j] (下标 i*K + j
slot_s_rt = K² : ŝ[i] ST_N 原地覆盖 s[i]
slot_e_rt = K² + K : ê[i]
slot_t_rt = K² + 2K : t̂[i]
```
### Setup
字节输出存于 `ek_mem`KMAX 最大 1568B`dkp_mem`(最大 1536B。byteEncode₁₂ 规则:每 2 个系数打包成 3 字节LSB 优先 12-bit
```
b0 = c0[7:0]
b1 = {c1[3:0], c0[11:8]}
b2 = c1[11:4]
```
完整私钥 dk 的字节布局(与 NIST KAT 的 sk 对齐):
```
dk = dk_pke(384·K) ‖ ek(384·K+32) ‖ H(ek)(32) ‖ z(32)
```
H(ek) 阶段采用预填充多块吸收:调用方逐块组装 136 字节速率块,在 `ek_bytes` 位置填 `0x06`、末块最后字节或上 `0x80`;分块数 `h_nblk_rt` 为 6/9/12对应 K=2/3/4
## 测试流程
`mlkem_top` 的验证策略是:**对全部三种安全等级,把硬件产出的 `ek`/`dk` 与 NIST KAT 标准答案逐字节比对**。验证素材、参数化 TB、运行脚本三者配合完成。
### 1. 黄金向量NIST KAT
测试向量来自 NIST FIPS 203 的 KAT 响应文件,经 `sync_rtl/top/TB/gen_vectors.py` 解析后生成每个用例的独立 hex 文件,存于 `sync_rtl/top/TB/vectors/`
| 文件 | 内容 | 字节长度(按 K |
|:---|:---|:---|
| `kat_k<K>_c<n>_d.hex` | KeyGen 种子 d | 32 |
| `kat_k<K>_c<n>_z.hex` | 隐式拒绝种子 z | 32 |
| `kat_k<K>_c<n>_ek.hex` | 期望公钥 pk== ek | 384·K+32 |
| `kat_k<K>_c<n>_dk.hex` | 期望私钥 sk== dk | 768·K+96 |
其中 `K ∈ {2,3,4}``n` 为用例号。当前覆盖:**K=2 共 5 个用例c0c4K=3 / K=4 各 3 个用例c0c2**,合计 11 个用例。
向量采用 “byte0 在低位” 约定256-bit 值满足 `bit[8m+:8] = byte m`
### 2. 参数化测试平台
`sync_rtl/top/TB/tb_mlkem_kg_katK_xsim.v` 是参数化自检 TB
- 通过 `parameter KP`(由 `xelab -generic_top KP=2|3|4` 设定)选择安全等级;
- 通过 `+CASE=n` plusarg 选择用例号,据此加载对应的 `kat_k<KP>_c<n>_*.hex`
- **将 `KP` 驱动到 DUT 的运行时输入 `k_i`**不再用参数覆盖KMAX 取默认 4
- 复位 → 加载 d/z 与 k_i → 拉 `start_i` 一拍 → 轮询 `done_o`(超时上限 200 万周期);
- 完成后通过 `dbg_byte_o`(读 ek0..EKB-1`dbg_dk_o`(读完整 dk0..DKB-1逐字节回读与黄金向量比对
- 全部相符打印 `K=<K> CASE <n> PASS`,否则打印前 8 个不匹配字节并报 `FAIL`
### 3. 运行测试
测试经由统一脚本 `run_tb.sh` 分发(自动 source Vivado 环境并设置 `LD_PRELOAD`
```bash
# Clone repository
git clone <repo-url> mlkem
cd mlkem
./run_tb.sh top
```
# Source Vivado (for XSIM)
该命令执行 `sync_rtl/top/TB/xsim_run.tcl`,其流程为:
1. **编译**`xvlog`):全部叶子算子 RTL + `mlkem_top.v` + 参数化 TB
2. **细化**`xelab`):为每种 K 生成一个快照 —— `KP=2→mlkem_kg_k2``KP=3→mlkem_kg_k3``KP=4→mlkem_kg_k4`
3. **仿真**`xsim -R -testplusarg CASE=n`):依次跑完每种 K 的全部用例。
整体测试矩阵:
```
K=2 (ML-KEM-512) : CASE 0,1,2,3,4 → ek 800B, dk 1632B
K=3 (ML-KEM-768) : CASE 0,1,2 → ek 1184B, dk 2400B
K=4 (ML-KEM-1024): CASE 0,1,2 → ek 1568B, dk 3168B
```
### 4. 预期结果
11 个用例全部 PASS每个用例确认 `ek == pk``dk == sk` 逐字节相等:
```
=== ML-KEM K=2 KAT case 0: KeyGen done in 21403 cyc ===
K=2 CASE 0 PASS: ek (800B)==pk, dk (1632B)==sk
...
K=4 CASE 2 PASS: ek (1568B)==pk, dk (3168B)==sk
```
### 验证注意事项
- **干净重跑**:每轮仿真前清理 `xsim.dir``.Xil`,避免旧快照污染(`rm -rf xsim.dir .Xil`)。
- **`$readmemh` 缺文件只是 WARNING**:文件名拼错时数据读为 X不会报错极易造成假 PASS。务必确认日志中无 `cannot be opened` 警告。
- **以日志文件为准**:将每个 `xsim` 调用重定向到独立日志后再 grep `PASS|FAIL|cannot be opened`,不要只看终端滚屏的模糊输出。
## 手动 XSIM 命令
```bash
source /opt/Xilinx/Vivado/2019.2/settings64.sh
export LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libtinfo.so.5 # ncurses fix for 2019.2 on modern Linux
export LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libtinfo.so.5 # Vivado 2019.2 的 ncurses 兼容修复
rm -rf xsim.dir .Xil
# 1) 编译(叶子算子 + 顶层 + TB
xvlog -sv --relax -i . \
sync_rtl/sha3/keccak_round.v sync_rtl/sha3/keccak_core.v sync_rtl/sha3/sha3_top.v \
sync_rtl/sample_ntt/sample_ntt_sync.v sync_rtl/sample_cbd/sample_cbd_sync.v \
sync_rtl/ntt/barrett_mul.v sync_rtl/ntt/zeta_rom.v sync_rtl/ntt/butterfly_unit.v sync_rtl/ntt/ntt_core.v \
sync_rtl/poly_mul/basecase_mul.v sync_rtl/poly_mul/poly_mul_zeta_rom.v sync_rtl/poly_mul/poly_mul_sync.v \
sync_rtl/top/mlkem_top.v \
sync_rtl/top/TB/tb_mlkem_kg_katK_xsim.v
# 2) 细化某一种 K
xelab tb_mlkem_kg_katK_xsim -generic_top KP=4 -s mlkem_kg_k4 --timescale 1ns/1ps
# 3) 跑某个用例
xsim mlkem_kg_k4 -R -testplusarg CASE=0
```
### Running Tests
## 先决条件
#### Vivado XSIM (Verilog Testbench)
- **Vivado 2019.2+**XSIM 仿真):`/opt/Xilinx/Vivado/2019.2/`
- **Verilator 5.046**(底层算子 C++ 验证)
- **Python 3.10+**(向量生成,仅用标准库)
## Vivado 2019.2 兼容性说明
在 Fedora 44 上经实测的必要 workaround
```bash
# List available modules
./run_tb.sh --list
# Run a specific module
./run_tb.sh mod_add
./run_tb.sh ntt
./run_tb.sh sample_cbd
# Run all modules
for m in mod_add rng poly_arith comp_decomp storage \
ntt poly_mul sample_cbd sample_ntt; do
./run_tb.sh "$m"
done
export LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libtinfo.so.5 # 必需ncurses 兼容库
xvlog -sv --relax -i . <file>.v # 用 -i非 -include_dirs指定包含目录--relax 放宽严格 SV 检查
xelab <top> -s <snap> --timescale 1ns/1ps # xelab 需显式 --timescale
```
Each module's testbench is in `sync_rtl/<module>/TB/`:
- `tb_<module>_xsim.v` — Verilog testbench (file-based vectors via `$readmemh`)
- `gen_vectors.py` — Python vector generator
- `vectors/<module>_input.hex` — Test input vectors
- `xsim_run.tcl` — Vivado compile/elaborate/simulate script
## 参考
#### Verilator (C++ Testbench)
- [FIPS 203: ML-KEM](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/203/final) —— NIST 标准(算法 16 KeyGen_internal
- [FIPS 202: SHA-3 / SHAKE](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/202/final) —— Keccak 哈希族
- [CRYSTALS-Kyber](https://pq-crystals.org/kyber/) —— 原始提案
```bash
cd test_framework
python3 run_all.py --list # List modules
python3 run_all.py --module ntt # Test a single module
python3 run_all.py --quick # Smoke test all modules
```
### Manual XSIM Commands
```bash
# Compile
xvlog -sv -i . sync_rtl/common/pipeline_reg.v sync_rtl/mod_add/mod_add_sync.v
xvlog -sv sync_rtl/mod_add/TB/tb_mod_add_xsim.v
# Elaborate
xelab tb_mod_add_xsim -s sim --timescale 1ns/1ps
# Simulate
xsim sim -R
```
## Design Decisions
### Synchronous Valid/Ready Streaming
All modules use a synchronous valid/ready handshake rather than fixed-latency interfaces. This allows:
- Natural backpressure propagation
- Easy composition of modules in pipelines
- Deterministic timing closure at 100MHz
### Barrett Modular Reduction
All modular multiplications use Barrett reduction (no DSP blocks, no division units):
- Precompute μ = ⌊2^k / q⌋ (k = 24 for q=3329)
- Compute a·b ≈ (a·b·μ) >> k, then correct with conditional subtraction
- Fully combinational, no pipeline stalls
### Cooley-Tukey / Gentleman-Sande NTT
The NTT core implements both forward (Cooley-Tukey) and inverse (Gentleman-Sande) transforms using a radix-2 decimation-in-time architecture:
- 7 butterfly stages (256 = 2^7 coefficients)
- Bit-reversed input/output ordering
- On-chip coefficient register file (256 × 12-bit)
- 24-cycle pipeline for Keccak permutations (shared with SHA-3 modules)
### Keccak-f[1600] Core
A single Keccak-f[1600] permutation engine is shared across all SHA-3/SHAKE modules (`sha3_top`, `sample_cbd_sync`, `sample_ntt_sync`). The core implements:
- 24 rounds with round constants (ι step)
- Full 1600-bit state (5×5×64 lanes)
- 24-cycle latency per permutation
- Input/output via valid/ready streaming interface
## Module Reference
| Module | Ports | Latency | Description |
|--------|-------|---------|-------------|
| `pipeline_reg` | data_i/o, valid_i/o, ready_i/o | 1 cycle | Generic pipeline stage |
| `skid_buffer` | data_i/o, valid_i/o, ready_i/o | 0-1 cycles | Backpressure buffer |
| `rng_sync` | valid_i → data_o[255:0] | 1 cycle | Galois LFSR PRNG |
| `mod_add_sync` | a[11:0], b[11:0] → sum[11:0] | 1 cycle | Modular addition |
| `ntt_core` | 256×coeff_in → 256×coeff_out | ~200 cycles | NTT/INTT transform |
| `poly_arith_sync` | coeff_a/b[11:0] → coeff_out[11:0] | 1 cycle | Poly add/sub |
| `poly_mul_sync` | 512×coeff → 256×coeff | ~300 cycles | NTT-domain poly multiply |
| `comp_decomp_sync` | coeff_in[11:0], d[4:0] → coeff_out | 1 cycle | Compress/Decompress |
| `sha3_top` | data_i[511:0], mode → hash_o[511:0] | ~24 cycles | SHA3/SHAKE |
| `sample_cbd_sync` | seed[255:0], nonce, eta → 256×coeff | ~300 cycles | CBD sampling |
| `sample_ntt_sync` | rho[255:0], k,i,j → 256×coeff | ~4000 cycles | SampleNTT |
| `s_bram` | rd/wr addr, data | 1 cycle | Single-port BRAM |
| `sd_bram` | rd addr, wr addr, data | 1 cycle | Dual-port BRAM |
## Test Coverage
| Module | Verilator (C++) | XSIM (Verilog) | Status |
|--------|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| sha3_top | ✅ | ✅ | PASS |
| keccak_core | — | ✅ | PASS |
| rng_sync | ✅ | ✅ | PASS |
| mod_add_sync | ✅ | ✅ | PASS |
| ntt_core | ✅ | ✅ | PASS |
| poly_arith_sync | ✅ | ✅ | PASS |
| poly_mul_sync | ✅ | ✅ | PASS |
| comp_decomp_sync | ✅ | ✅ | PASS |
| sample_cbd_sync | ✅ | ✅ | PASS |
| sample_ntt_sync | ✅ | ✅ | PASS |
| s_bram / sd_bram | ✅ | ✅ | PASS |
| pipeline_reg | Through parent | — | OK |
| skid_buffer | Through parent | — | OK |
## Vivado 2019.2 Compatibility Notes
This project was tested with Vivado 2019.2 on Fedora 44. Known workarounds:
```bash
# Required: ncurses compatibility library
export LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libtinfo.so.5
# Use -i flag (not -include_dirs) for include paths
xvlog -sv -i . <file>.v
# Add --timescale to xelab
xelab <top> -s <snap> --timescale 1ns/1ps
# Add --relax for strict SystemVerilog mode
xvlog -sv --relax <file>.v
```
## TODO / Roadmap
- [ ] Top-level integration module (full KeyGen / Encaps / Decaps FSM)
- [ ] AXI-Stream bridge for FPGA integration
- [ ] Resource optimization (share Keccak instances, pipeline balancing)
- [ ] Formal verification of Barrett multiplier
- [ ] Power analysis and side-channel hardening
- [ ] XDC constraints for FPGA synthesis (timing, I/O)
## License
[Specify license]
## References
- [FIPS 203: ML-KEM](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/203/final) — NIST standard
- [FIPS 202: SHA-3 / SHAKE](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/202/final) — Keccak-based hash
- [CRYSTALS-Kyber](https://pq-crystals.org/kyber/) — Original submission

View File

@@ -1,101 +1,115 @@
# create_project.tcl — 自动创建 Vivado 工程,添加所有 RTL 源文件和 testbench
# create_project.tcl — 自动创建 Vivado 工程(仿真用),加载 ML-KEM KeyGen
# 顶层 mlkem_top 及其全部叶子算子与参数化 KAT testbench。
#
# 与已验证的 XSIM 流程sync_rtl/top/TB/xsim_run.tcl保持一致
# - 仅加载 mlkem_top 实际依赖的 14 个源文件
# - 顶层仿真模块 = tb_mlkem_kg_katK_xsim
# - 运行时安全等级由 generic KP2/3/4选择用例号由 +CASE 选择
#
# Usage:
# cd ~/Dev/mlkem
# vivado -mode batch -source create_project.tcl
#
# Or in Vivado Tcl Console:
# 或在 Vivado Tcl Console 中:
# source create_project.tcl
#
# 切换被仿真的配置(默认 KP=2, CASE=0编辑下方 SIM_KP / SIM_CASE 后重跑,
# 或在工程打开后执行:
# set_property generic "KP=4" [get_filesets sim_1]
# set_property -name {xsim.simulate.xsim.more_options} -value {-testplusarg CASE=2} -objects [get_filesets sim_1]
set PROJECT_NAME mlkem
set PROJECT_DIR [file normalize [file dirname [info script]]]
# Create project (simulation-only, no FPGA part needed)
# 默认仿真配置(可改)
set SIM_KP 2 ;# ML-KEM 方案2=512, 3=768, 4=1024
set SIM_CASE 0 ;# KAT 用例号K=2: 0..4, K=3/4: 0..2
# 仅仿真工程,无需指定 FPGA partXSim 用默认 part 即可)
create_project -force ${PROJECT_NAME} ${PROJECT_DIR}/vivado_prj
# Set top-level testbench
set_property top tb_mlkem_top_xsim [current_fileset -simset]
set_property target_simulator XSim [current_project]
# ── Common infrastructure ──
read_verilog -sv [glob ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/common/*.v]
# ===================================================================
# RTL 源文件 —— 与 xsim_run.tcl 完全一致的 14 个文件
# ===================================================================
# ── SHA3 / Keccak ──
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/sha3/keccak_round.v
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/sha3/keccak_core.v
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/sha3/sha3_top.v
# ── SHA3 Chain (shared variant for top-level integration) ──
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/sha3_chain/sha3_chain_top_shared.v
# ── RNG ──
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/rng/rng_sync.v
# ── 采样 ──
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/sample_ntt/sample_ntt_sync.v
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/sample_cbd/sample_cbd_sync.v
# ── NTT ──
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/ntt/zeta_rom.v
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/ntt/barrett_mul.v
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/ntt/zeta_rom.v
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/ntt/butterfly_unit.v
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/ntt/ntt_core.v
# ── Polynomial Arithmetic ──
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/poly_arith/poly_arith_sync.v
# ── Polynomial Multiplication ──
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/poly_mul/poly_mul_zeta_rom.v
# ── 多项式乘法 ──
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/poly_mul/basecase_mul.v
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/poly_mul/poly_mul_zeta_rom.v
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/poly_mul/poly_mul_sync.v
# ── Sampling ──
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/sample_cbd/sample_cbd_sync_shared.v
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/sample_ntt/sample_ntt_sync_shared.v
# ── Compression & Modular Arithmetic ──
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/comp_decomp/comp_decomp_sync.v
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/mod_add/mod_add_sync.v
# ── Storage (BRAM) ──
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/storage/s_bram.v
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/storage/sd_bram.v
# ── Top-level Integration ──
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/top/keccak_arbiter.v
# ── 顶层 KeyGen 集成 ──
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/top/mlkem_top.v
# ── Testbench ──
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/top/TB/tb_mlkem_top_xsim.v
# ── 参数化 KAT testbench ──
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/top/TB/tb_mlkem_kg_katK_xsim.v
# ── Independent KG / EN / DE testbenches ──
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/kg/TB/tb_kg_xsim.v
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/en/TB/tb_en_xsim.v
read_verilog -sv ${PROJECT_DIR}/sync_rtl/de/TB/tb_de_xsim.v
# ===================================================================
# 仿真设置
# ===================================================================
# ── Include path for `include directives ──
set_property include_dirs ${PROJECT_DIR} [current_fileset -simset]
# 顶层仿真模块
set_property top tb_mlkem_kg_katK_xsim [get_filesets sim_1]
set_property top_lib xil_defaultlib [get_filesets sim_1]
# ── Simulation settings ──
# `include "sync_rtl/common/defines.vh" 的包含路径(相对工程根)
set_property include_dirs ${PROJECT_DIR} [get_filesets sim_1]
# 运行时安全等级:通过 TB 顶层 generic KP 传入2/3/4
set_property generic "KP=${SIM_KP}" [get_filesets sim_1]
# 跑到 $finish 为止显式时标XSim 默认已加 --relax勿重复
set_property -name {xsim.simulate.runtime} -value {all} -objects [get_filesets sim_1]
set_property -name {xsim.elaborate.xelab.more_options} -value {--timescale 1ns/1ps} -objects [get_filesets sim_1]
set_property -name {xsim.elaborate.xelab.more_options} \
-value {--timescale 1ns/1ps} -objects [get_filesets sim_1]
# Copy test vectors to simulation directory before run
# (Vivado GUI runs xsim in vivado_prj/mlkem.sim/sim_1/behav/xsim/)
# $readmemh looks relative to the xsim working directory
# ===================================================================
# 测试向量:Vivado GUI vivado_prj/mlkem.sim/sim_1/behav/xsim/ 下运行
# xsim而 TB 的 $readmemh 路径相对工程根sync_rtl/top/TB/vectors/…)。
# 用 compile 的 pre-hook在 xsim 工作目录、且在 compile/elaborate/simulate
# 之前执行)把整套 KAT 向量复制到同名相对路径下CASE 经 -testplusarg 选择。
#
# 注意2019.2 的 sim_1 没有 simulate.tcl.pre 属性,且追加 -tclbatch 会排在
# Vivado 自带(含 "run all")的 tclbatch 之后、即仿真跑完才执行(太迟)。
# 因此用 xsim.compile.tcl.pre —— 它最早执行且就在仿真工作目录里。
# ===================================================================
set pre_tcl [file join ${PROJECT_DIR} vivado_prj copy_vectors_pre.tcl]
set fp [open $pre_tcl w]
puts $fp "# Auto-generated: copy test vectors to xsim working directory"
puts $fp "# Auto-generated by create_project.tcl: KAT xsim "
puts $fp "file mkdir sync_rtl/top/TB/vectors"
puts $fp "file copy -force [file join ${PROJECT_DIR} sync_rtl top TB vectors mlkem_top_input.hex] sync_rtl/top/TB/vectors/"
puts $fp "file copy -force [file join ${PROJECT_DIR} sync_rtl top TB vectors mlkem_top_expected.hex] sync_rtl/top/TB/vectors/"
puts $fp "puts {Vectors copied successfully}"
puts $fp "foreach v \[glob -nocomplain [file join ${PROJECT_DIR} sync_rtl top TB vectors kat_k*_c*_*.hex]\] {"
puts $fp " file copy -force \$v sync_rtl/top/TB/vectors/"
puts $fp "}"
puts $fp "puts {\[create_project\] KAT vectors copied to xsim working dir}"
close $fp
set_property -name {xsim.compile.tcl.pre} -value $pre_tcl -objects [get_filesets sim_1]
set_property -name {xsim.simulate.xsim.more_options} \
-value "-tclbatch $pre_tcl" \
-value "-testplusarg CASE=${SIM_CASE}" \
-objects [get_filesets sim_1]
# Save project
# ===================================================================
puts "========================================"
puts " Project created: ${PROJECT_DIR}/vivado_prj/${PROJECT_NAME}.xpr"
puts " Run simulation:"
puts " launch_simulation"
puts " run all"
puts " 仿: ML-KEM K=${SIM_KP}, KAT CASE=${SIM_CASE}"
puts " 仿: launch_simulation; run all"
puts " : K=${SIM_KP} CASE ${SIM_CASE} PASS: ek==pk, dk==sk"
puts ""
puts " K=4 SIM_KP/SIM_CASE "
puts " generic relaunch_sim"
puts "========================================"